Price range: $10.00 through $75.00

SKU: N/A Categories: ,

Description

Digital print in red, yellow, green, and black. Each spot color is selected from Pantones derived from traditional natural dyes. Original composition illustrated by Nathan Hatt.

Additional information

Weight N/A
Dimensions N/A
Size

8×10, 5×7, 18×24

Previous ArticleNext Article
I.

Inspiring Young Historians

This article was originally published in the Early Childhood PBL blog on June 2, 2024.

If you ask a first-grade student at A2 STEAM about the history of their school, you might be surprised by the detailed response you receive. They might tell you about Katherine Harrington, the first principal when the school was called Northside Elementary, or about the ice rink that existed outside the school for decades until the weather became too warm to keep it frozen. They might also share that after the school transitioned to a K-8 institution, a new gym, a STEAM Lab, a band room, two new classrooms, and a middle school wing were built. Their knowledge reflects a rich history curriculum, designed through Project-Based Learning (PBL). This unit was collaboratively authored and refined by first-grade teachers Beth Lafferty, Liz Pierce, and Caroline Semrau.

Designing a Curriculum that Engages

At A2 STEAM, teachers design much of the curriculum using the PBLWorks framework. Students in grades K-8 engage in collaborative learning, skill acquisition, and creative expression through rigorous PBL units three to five times each school year. Over the past decade, teachers have refined these units through structured reflection and collaboration. They evaluate the authenticity of activities and artifacts using criteria outlined by John Larmer in his 2012 article, “PBL: What Does It Take for a Project to Be ‘Authentic’?” on the Edutopia website. These criteria include:

  • Personal Authenticity: The project focuses on issues relevant to students’ lives.
  • Contextual Authenticity: The project sets up realistic scenarios or simulations.
  • Procedural Authenticity: The project involves tools and processes used in real-world settings.
  • Impactful Authenticity: The project meets real-world needs or creates products used by real people.

Engaging Students with Personal Authenticity

We don’t often think of six- and seven-year-olds as history buffs, but they are naturally curious. At A2 STEAM, a carefully crafted Entry Event sparked this curiosity at the Ann Arbor District Library. Students rotated through stations, with one station led by Jared Aumen, Ann Arbor Public Schools Secondary Social Studies Chair, who explained the role of historians. He showed students pictures of A2 STEAM from different eras, prompting them to ask questions and think like historians.

The young historians then visited the AADL 200 exhibit, where large-format photographs compared familiar Ann Arbor landmarks to 20th-century black-and-white photos. This experience generated excitement and deeper questions, which were perfect for introducing the Driving Question: “How does the history of Ann Arbor connect to the history of our neighborhood and our school?” Teachers used the Need to Know protocol to guide students in asking questions to better understand the challenge.

AADL’s Colin Simpson discusses the first graders’ projects with them.

Building Knowledge and Contextual Authenticity

PBL at A2 STEAM includes an inquiry component and a design challenge. For this unit, students learned about the school’s history as part of Ann Arbor’s Bicentennial celebration. They created timelines and maps of the school’s changes over the years, then moved to the design phase, asking, “How can we teach others about the history of our school?” This challenge was framed to solve a real-world problem, making learning relevant and impactful.

Deepening Inquiry with Procedural Authenticity

Historians work like detectives, examining evidence to solve mysteries. In this project, students explored archival storage boxes filled with documents, yearbooks, photographs, and film reels, which had been hidden in the school’s basement for decades. They asked questions like, “When did we have an auditorium?” and “When was that wing built?” This primary source exploration was naturally engaging.

Students then interviewed community members who had been part of the school at different times, including former students, teachers, and administrators. These firsthand accounts helped students connect personal stories to historical artifacts, enhancing their understanding and inquiry.

Principal Torian Billings listens to a student’s history report

Making an Authentic Impact

Last year, the project culminated in a school tour where students created historical markers and led their families through the school, serving as docents and experts. This year, students created permanent displays for the Traverwood Branch of the Ann Arbor District Library, wrote and curated facts about the school’s history, and created a podcast with the help of eighth-grade students. These products can be viewed on this website.

Reflecting on the Journey

The project evolved from a family unit to a school history unit, providing a more equitable experience for a diverse student body. During the pandemic, Environmental Education teachers Coert Ambrosino and Dave Szczygiel designed lessons about the school’s history, which inspired the current project. Structured workshop time allowed teachers to reflect on and revise their PBL units. Feedback from experts like Jared Aumen in this collaborative design time led to high engagement and meaningful outcomes for students.

Structured opportunities for revision help teacher teams to make better decisions for their students. During this reflection, teachers take personal notes in the single-point rubric for project authenticity and come together as a team to discuss their thoughts and ideas. The changes made to this project over the years have made learning more accessible to a widening range of learning styles, cultural backgrounds, and academic proficiencies. Every child who participates in this unit of study is given the opportunity to engage in the history of their school meaningfully and is taught the skills to be successful in this endeavor. 

This teacher team, alongside district and building leadership, presented their work at the 2024 Michigan Social Studies Conference, sharing their journey of design, facilitation, and reflection. By setting high expectations, providing voice and choice, and inviting collaboration, teachers at A2 STEAM create powerful learning experiences as authors and participants in the process.

P.

Project Based Learning & Culturally Responsive Teaching

There is much discussion lately among teaching communities about the concept of Culturally Responsive Teaching. There have been many equity and diversity models in education over the years, so it is important to distinguish the differences between them to better understand CRT. According to the work of Zaretta Hammond, self proclaimed “former writing teacher turned equity freedom fighter,” CRT can be distinguished from other models in the following ways:

Multicultural EducationSocial Justice EducationCulturally Responsive Teaching
Focuses on celebrating diversity.Focuses on exposing the social political context that students experience.Focuses on improving the learning capacity of diverse students who have been marginalized educationally.
Centers around creating positive social interactions across difference.Centers around raising students’ consciousness about inequity in everyday social, environmental, economic, and political aspects of life.Centers around the affective & cognitive aspects of teaching and learning.
Concerns itself with exposing privileged students to diverse literature, multiple perspectives, and inclusion in the curriculum as well as help students of color see themselves reflected.Concerns itself with creating lenses to recognize and interrupt inequitable patterns and practices in society.Concerns itself with building resilience and academic mindset by pushing back on dominant narratives about people of color.

While there is no singular approach to inclusive teaching, it is worth noting that different approaches favor different outcomes. The goal with Multicultural Education could be stated as striving toward social harmony. The goal with Social Justice Education could be stated as engendering and cultivating critical consciousness. The goal with Culturally Responsive Teaching, however, places a premium on all students actuated as independent learners.

The value that this approach brings to the conversation of equity and inclusion should not be understated. Harmony and consciousness are important, but achievement is also a favorable outcome. It is favorable because it equips the learner with the skills needed to create the life that they choose. But CRT is not a checklist. Teachers do this work responsively. They are practitioners and practitioners are positioned to evaluate the impact of their practice as it pertains to achievement outcomes. After all, the case can be made for most instructional practices that they have a positive impact on achievement. Only when approaches are evaluated in comparison with each other can they be understood. This idea has been developed through the research of John Hattie over decades. The text Visible Learning helps practioners evaluate strategies in their own practice, given that Visible Learning “occurs when teachers see learning through the eyes of students and help them become their own teachers.” As PBL teachers, we ask ourselves the question, “How does PBL help students to become their own teachers?”

For a long time, project based learning has been ill-defined and inconsistently administered. The research from Hattie reflects this. PBL in and of itself is not a high-leverage practice. PBL is valuable because it is an excellent vehicle for high-leverage instruction. Unfortunately, there is not enough data yet to evaluate the effect of Gold Standard PBL as dictated by Buck Institute, but we can look at the effect of high-leverage practices if we unpack them within the PBL model. Through these high-leverage practices, practitioners move the locus of learning to the student-centered learning environment. This is a departure from what is often seen as the traditional approach – learning coming from the teacher or text books. Through this reorganization, and in concert with Multicultural and Social Justice Education, the learner is positioned to construct their own narrative.

Hattie describes strategies that are worth the investment of finite instructional time as being greater than or equal to an effect size of .4. He calls this the hinge point. One strategy identified through this work is classified as “strategy to integrate with prior knowledge.” It has an effect size of .94. You can see this programmatically applied in high quality PBL as the “need to know” protocol. Not only does this process account for the diverse perspectives of learners, positioning them to begin the learning path by activating prior knowledge, it sets the stage for authentic classroom discussions. This has an effect size of .82. By returning to the questions laid out by students, and ideally generating new ones along the way, the need to know protocol eschews some of the common pitfalls of traditional discussion structures such as question taxonomies – essentially questions generated by teachers. It also has a tendency to distribute the power dynamics of the discussion because the locus has been moved from the teacher to the students.

Evaluation and reflection is yet another effective strategy that is well-articulated within the BIE’s Gold Standard PBL framework. It carries an effect size of .72. Evaluation and reflection is characterized in many different ways in PBL. The need to know process itself creates a framework for students to self-evaluate their path along a challenging question. We also use protocols embedded in the design thinking framework to ensure that this feedback comes early and often.

Strategies are tools, and educators employ these tools in sophisticated ways to achieve optimal outcomes. John Dewey writes in School and Society, “What the best and wisest parent wants for [their] child, that must we want for all the children of the community. Anything less is unlovely, and left unchecked, destroys our democracy.” As culturally responsive teachers, we endure in this mission, and respond to our students through project-based learning.